- Inspection year
- 2024
- Report date
- 25-Jun-2025
- PCAOB release
- 104-2025-105
- Audits reviewed
- 12
- Audits w/ Part I.A deficiencies
- 6
- Part I.A deficiency rate
- 50%
- Part I.A deficiencies
- 19
- Part I.B deficiencies
- 6
- Report
- View PDF ↗
Deficiencies (19)
Grouped by issuer and in the same order as the PCAOB report, so each item ties back directly to the source.
Issuer A6 deficiencies
| # | Area | Deficiency | Standard | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other Liabilities | The firm selected for testing a control that consisted of the issuer's review of its earnout liability which is a provision for contingent payments. The firm did not evaluate the specific review procedures the control owners performed to assess the reasonableness of the method data and assumptions used in the valuation of the earnout liability. (AS 2201.42 and .44) Unrelated to our review the issuer reevaluated its controls over its earnout liability and concluded that a material weakness existed that had not been previously identified. The issuer subsequently reflected this material weakness in a revision to its report on ICFR and the firm revised its opinion on the effectiveness of the issuer's ICFR to express an adverse opinion and reissued its report. Both financial statement and ICFR audits | AS 2201.42; AS 2201.44 | |
| 2 | Other Liabilities | The firm's approach for substantively testing the fair value of the earnout liability was to test the issuer's process. The firm recalculated the issuer's estimate using a software audit tool. The firm did not perform sufficient substantive procedures to evaluate the method used by the issuer because it did not test the functionality of this tool. (AS 2501.10) Both financial statement and ICFR audits | AS 2501.10 | |
| 3 | Other Liabilities | The firm did not test or sufficiently test controls over the accuracy of certain data that the issuer used to calculate the earnout liability. (AS 1105.10) Both financial statement and ICFR audits | AS 1105.10 | |
| 4 | Segment Reporting | The firm did not identify and test any controls over segment reporting. (AS 2201.39) Unrelated to our review the issuer reevaluated its controls over segment reporting and concluded that a material weakness existed that had not been previously identified. The issuer subsequently reflected this material weakness in a revision to its report on ICFR and the firm revised its opinion on the effectiveness of the issuer's ICFR to express an adverse opinion and reissued its report. Both financial statement and ICFR audits | AS 2201.39 | |
| 5 | Segment Reporting | The firm did not perform substantive procedures to evaluate whether the issuer's determination of its reportable segments was in conformity with FASB ASC Topic 280 Segment Reporting beyond reading an issuer-prepared memorandum. (AS 2301.08) Both financial statement and ICFR audits | AS 2301.8 | |
| 6 | Journal Entries | The firm selected for testing a control that consisted of the issuer's review of manual journal entries. The firm did not identify and test any controls over the completeness of a system-generated report used in the operation of this control. (AS 2201.39) Unrelated to our review the issuer reevaluated its controls over journal entries and concluded that a material weakness existed that had not been previously identified. The issuer subsequently reflected this material weakness in a revision to its report on ICFR and the firm revised its opinion on the effectiveness of the issuer's ICFR to express an adverse opinion and reissued its report. Both financial statement and ICFR audits | AS 2201.39 |
Issuer B4 deficiencies
| # | Area | Deficiency | Standard | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Revenue | The issuer recognized revenue from certain contracts over time by estimating its progress toward completion. The firm did not perform procedures to test this revenue beyond inspecting the contract and inquiring of project managers for a sample of contracts. (AS 2501.07) Financial statement audit only | AS 2501.7 | |
| 2 | Revenue | The firm did not identify and evaluate the issuer's omission of certain required disclosures under FASB ASC Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers related to the method used to recognize revenue for one type of revenue. (AS 2810.30 and .31) Financial statement audit only | AS 2810.30; AS 2810.31 | |
| 3 | Inventory | The firm did not perform any procedures to test the existence of certain inventory. (AS 2301.08) Financial statement audit only | AS 2301.8 | |
| 4 | Inventory | The firm did not identify and evaluate the issuer's omission of a required disclosure under FASB ASC Topic 210 Balance Sheet related to major classes of inventory. (AS 2810.30 and .31) Financial statement audit only | AS 2810.30; AS 2810.31 |
Issuer C5 deficiencies
| # | Area | Deficiency | Standard | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Inventory | The issuer calculated a reserve for excess and obsolete inventory by applying established percentages to each inventory aging category. The following deficiencies were identified: · The firm selected for testing a control over the issuer's review of the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory. The firm did not identify and test any controls over the accuracy of certain data used in the operation of this control. (AS 2201.39) Both financial statement and ICFR audits | AS 2201.39 | |
| 2 | Inventory | The issuer calculated a reserve for excess and obsolete inventory by applying established percentages to each inventory aging category. The following deficiencies were identified: · The firm used these data in its substantive procedures but did not perform any procedures to test or test any controls over the accuracy of these data. (AS 1105.10) Both financial statement and ICFR audits | AS 1105.10 | |
| 3 | Inventory | The firm selected for testing a control that included the issuer's review of journal entries related to inventory. The firm did not identify and test any controls over the accuracy and completeness of certain information used in the operation of this control. (AS 2201.39) Both financial statement and ICFR audits | AS 2201.39 | |
| 4 | Inventory | The firm did not perform any substantive procedures to test certain adjustments the issuer made to its inventory. (AS 2301.08) Both financial statement and ICFR audits | AS 2301.8 | |
| 5 | Long-Lived Assets | The firm did not identify and test any controls related to the issuer's evaluation of long-lived assets for possible impairment. (AS 2201.39) Both financial statement and ICFR audits | AS 2201.39 |
Issuer D2 deficiencies
| # | Area | Deficiency | Standard | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Revenue | The issuer recognized certain revenue based on customer usage data which was produced by one of the issuer's information technology (IT) systems. The firm did not perform procedures to test these data beyond comparing these data to information derived from this IT system. (AS 2301.08 and .13) Financial statement audit only | AS 2301.8; AS 2301.13 | |
| 2 | Journal Entries | To identify and select journal entries for testing the firm identified fraud characteristics. For certain of these fraud characteristics the firm did not perform any procedures to identify journal entries that had these characteristics. (AS 2401.61) Financial statement audit only | AS 2401.61 |
Issuer E1 deficiency
| # | Area | Deficiency | Standard | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Revenue | The issuer recognized revenue from certain contracts over time using an input method based on the labor hours incurred or number of users. The firm did not perform substantive procedures to test whether the issuer satisfied its performance obligations before recognizing this revenue beyond comparing the number of users and labor hours incurred to issuer-produced reports. (AS 2301.08 and .13) Financial statement audit only | AS 2301.8; AS 2301.13 |
Issuer F1 deficiency
| # | Area | Deficiency | Standard | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Business Combinations | During the year the issuer acquired a business. The firm did not identify and evaluate the issuer's omission of certain required disclosures under FASB ASC Topic 805 Business Combinations related to the amounts of revenue and earnings of the acquired business since the acquisition date. (AS 2810.30 and .31) In connection with our review the issuer reevaluated its disclosures related to this business combination and determined that certain disclosures were omitted. The issuer did not file an amended Form 10-K or Form 8-K indicating that its previously issued financial statements should not be relied on. Instead the issuer corrected these omissions in a subsequent filing. Financial statement audit only | AS 2810.30; AS 2810.31 |