PCAOB Deficiency Tracker
← Back to Explorer

Samil PricewaterhouseCoopers

South Korea · PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited · Triennially Inspected

Inspection year
2021
Report date
07-Nov-2022
PCAOB release
104-2023-018
Audits reviewed
3
Audits w/ Part I.A deficiencies
1
Part I.A deficiency rate
33%
Part I.A deficiencies
3
Part I.B deficiencies
2
Report
View PDF ↗

Deficiencies (3)

Grouped by issuer and in the same order as the PCAOB report, so each item ties back directly to the source.

Issuer A3 deficiencies

#AreaDeficiencyStandardFlags
1Investment SecuritiesThe issuer held a portfolio of investment securities which were carried at fair value. The issuer recorded the fair value of certain investment securities based on prices it obtained from external pricing agencies. The following deficiencies were identified: - The firm did not identify and test any controls over the reasonableness of the prices obtained from external pricing agencies used by the issuer to determine the valuation of certain investment securities. (AS 2201.39)
Both financial statement and ICFR audits
AS 2201.39
2Investment SecuritiesThe issuer held a portfolio of investment securities which were carried at fair value. The issuer recorded the fair value of certain investment securities based on prices it obtained from external pricing agencies. The following deficiencies were identified: - The sample size the firm used in its substantive procedures to test the valuation of certain investment securities was too small to provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence because these procedures were designed based on a level of control reliance that was not supported due to the deficiency in the firm's control testing discussed above. (AS 2301.16 .18 and .37; AS 2315.19 .23 and .23A)
Both financial statement and ICFR audits
AS 2301.16; AS 2301.18; AS 2301.37; AS 2315.19
3Investment SecuritiesThe issuer held a portfolio of investment securities which were carried at fair value. The issuer recorded the fair value of certain investment securities based on prices it obtained from external pricing agencies. The following deficiencies were identified: - The sample size the firm used in its substantive procedures to test the valuation of certain investment securities was too small to provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence because these procedures were designed based on a level of control reliance that was not supported due to the deficiency in the firm's control testing discussed above. (AS 2301.16 .18 and .37; AS 2315.19 .23 and .23A)
Both financial statement and ICFR audits
AS 2315.23; AS 2315.23A