PCAOB Deficiency Tracker
← Back to Explorer

Elliott Davis, LLC

United States · Triennially Inspected

Inspection year
2019
Report date
21-Sep-2021
PCAOB release
104-2021-176a
Audits reviewed
3
Audits w/ Part I.A deficiencies
2
Part I.A deficiency rate
67%
Part I.A deficiencies
5
Part I.B deficiencies
Report
View PDF ↗

Deficiencies (5)

Grouped by issuer and in the same order as the PCAOB report, so each item ties back directly to the source.

Issuer A3 deficiencies

#AreaDeficiencyStandardFlags
1Allowance for Credit/Loan LossesThe firm selected for testing a control that consisted of the issuer's review of certain loans based on risk indicators including an identification of problem loans which operated during the first seven months of the year. The firm did not evaluate the review procedures that the control owner performed including the procedures to identify items for follow up and the procedures to determine whether those items were appropriately resolved. (AS 2201.42 and .44)
Both financial statement and ICFR audits
AS 2201.42; AS 2201.44
2Allowance for Credit/Loan LossesThe firm selected for testing a control that consisted of the issuer's review of certain loans based on risk indicators including an identification of problem loans which operated during the first seven months of the year. The firm did not identify and test any controls over the issuer's review of loans for the last five months of the year. (AS 2201.39)
Both financial statement and ICFR audits
AS 2201.39
3Allowance for Credit/Loan LossesThe firm's approach for substantively testing the ALL was to review and test management's process. The firm did not perform sufficient procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of the ALL because the firm did not perform procedures to test certain factors and assumptions used by the issuer to determine the qualitative component of the ALL. (AS 2501.09 .10 and .11)
Both financial statement and ICFR audits
AS 2501.9; AS 2501.10; AS 2501.11

Issuer B2 deficiencies

#AreaDeficiencyStandardFlags
1InvestmentsThe firm selected for testing a control that included the issuer's review of the comparison of fair values of certain investments provided by external parties for one investment from each investment type held by the issuer. The firm did not evaluate whether the control could effectively prevent or detect a material misstatement as designed. Further the firm did not evaluate the review procedures that the control owner performed including the procedures to identify items for follow up and the procedures to determine whether those items were appropriately resolved. (AS 2201.42 and .44)
ICFR audit only
AS 2201.42; AS 2201.44
2InvestmentsThe firm did not identify and test any controls over the appropriateness of the classification of investments. (AS 2201.39)
ICFR audit only
AS 2201.39