PCAOB Deficiency Tracker
← Back to Explorer

Porter Keadle Moore LLC

United States · Triennially Inspected

Inspection year
2019
Report date
06-Jul-2021
PCAOB release
104-2021-141
Audits reviewed
3
Audits w/ Part I.A deficiencies
2
Part I.A deficiency rate
67%
Part I.A deficiencies
4
Part I.B deficiencies
Report
View PDF ↗

Deficiencies (4)

Grouped by issuer and in the same order as the PCAOB report, so each item ties back directly to the source.

Issuer A3 deficiencies

#AreaDeficiencyStandardFlags
1Allowance for Credit/Loan LossesThe firm selected for testing a control that consisted of the issuer's review of risk grades assigned to commercial graded loans. The loan grades were an important factor in estimating the ALL. The sample size used by the firm to test the control was too small to provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support its conclusion that the control was operating effectively. (AS 2201.46)
Both financial statement and ICFR audits
AS 2201.46
2Allowance for Credit/Loan LossesThe firm selected for testing a control that consisted of the issuer's review of problem loans. The firm did not evaluate the review procedures that the control owners performed including the procedures to identify items for follow up and the procedures to determine whether those items were appropriately resolved. (AS 2201.42 and .44)
Both financial statement and ICFR audits
AS 2201.42; AS 2201.44
3Allowance for Credit/Loan LossesThe sample size the firm used in its substantive procedures to test the reasonableness of assigned loan grades was too small to provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence because these procedures were designed based on a level of control reliance that was not supported due to the deficiencies in the firm's control testing discussed above. (AS 2301.16 .18 and .37; AS 2315.19 .23 and .23A)
Both financial statement and ICFR audits
AS 2301.16; AS 2301.18; AS 2301.37; AS 2315.19; AS 2315.23; AS 2315.23A

Issuer B1 deficiency

#AreaDeficiencyStandardFlags
1Allowance for Credit/Loan LossesThe firm selected for testing a control that consisted of the external review of loan grades. The sample size used by the firm to test the control was too small to provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support its conclusion that the control was operating effectively. As a result the sample size the firm used in its substantive procedures to test the reasonableness of assigned loan grades was too small to provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence because these procedures were designed based on a level of control reliance that was not supported due to the deficiencies in the firm's control testing discussed above. (AS 2301.16 .18 and .37; AS 2315.19 and .23 and .23A)
Financial statement audit only
AS 2301.16; AS 2301.18; AS 2301.37; AS 2315.19; AS 2315.23; AS 2315.23A